Post by mistermulatto on May 14, 2005 20:28:10 GMT -5
resist.com/positions/Race.html 
Those Racism-by-Denial Racists
G e n e P i r a c y
- Is she black, white or other? -
On page C5 of the April 10th issue of The Washington Times is found an article about Henriette Delille, "First U.S. black woman considered for sainthood," along with her picture. But the photo of the would-be saint isn't of a black woman but a white-appearing one.
Another example is the photo and story of Charles R. Drew, so-called "black inventor" of blood plasma and blood-banking innovations--Washington Times, March 3, 1996, page B5. Mr. Drew appears white not black, having Caucasian features.
Then there is the August 22nd, 1999, review of "Homelands And Waterways: The American Journey Of The Bond Family," which book is about a black Englishman who became an American--a "black" man who just happened to have a white mother.
Or one might read the August 29th review of "Love Across Color Lines: Ottilie Assing and Frederick Douglass," which fails to mention that the always-hunting-white-women Douglas was biracial, and which fact makes examination of "crossing the color line" an exercise in deception.
Or consider the 4x5 picture of a white-appearing man, Michael Gray, who is referred to as a "Blackfoot and Chippewaree Indian," in a September 1st article, "Census Bureau makes effort to count American Indians."
Or one might count the number of light-skinned and Caucasian-featured "blacks" passing as Negroid in many TV ads. Why aren't true blacks protesting the ruse and demanding more Negroid faces in ads?—maybe because any re-definition of "black" shifts the definition of "Negroid" (read my essay, "The 'One-Drop Rule' as Two-Edged Sword").
Excluding The Non-Negroid Parent Is Racist
The Negroid race is gradually shifting the historical/anthropological meaning of "Negroid" through gene piracy--calling people born from mixed-race parentage "black" when they have no logical or legitimate claim to that identity (examine the many photos of "black" inventors, military officers, scientists, authors, physicians, etc., to discover the degree of gene piracy perpetrated by racism-by-denial racists).
By purposely excluding the race of the non-Negroid parent -- partly by embracing the "one-drop rule" used in the past by whites to identify those having any African heritage -- blacks rob whites of their contributing heritage and, ergo, commit gene piracy through racism-by-denial.
[Note: Some argue that all humanity has its origins through a black African ancestor, which argument is falsely used to claim that we're all Africans, and which illogical argument could be used to call ourselves "primordial slime." Whites are not Africans nor primordial slime but a distinct race]
Do Blacks Come In All Colors?
Racism-by-denial is widespread in America, where, as Oprah Winfrey proclaimed on one of her emotion- drenched shows, "Blacks come in all colors!" Examples of the absurd degree to which racism-by-denial can be practiced are found within the Native American cultures, where white-appearing "Indians" travel about the country giving lectures on Indian culture and tout their Indian pride and heritage, exhibiting no discernible Indian heritage except their braided -- sometimes black-dyed -- hair and their Indian jewelry.
Do Whites Come In All Colors, Too?
Why don't whites come in all colors? Because whites aren't scrambling to practice gene piracy, lacking any need to uplift the historical/ anthropological record of their race through racism-by-denial.
Coveting Heritable Talents
Racism-by-denial in America is for uplifting the meaning of "black African"--by attributing to that race the talents and abilities heretofore not generally exhibited by them, so that any unusual talents (particularly intellectual ones) displayed by anyone having any black (or any other minority) heritage are called anything but "white" (a majority of mixed-race couples is of black men and white women. Why? Black males' racism against black women? Why wouldn't black men prefer white women?).
Doesn't the white parent of a mixed-race child have as much claim to demonstrable talents in the child as the black or Latino or Asian or Indian parent? Or does the one-drop rule still protect the white race from dysgenic mongrelization--from loss of the white race?
Breeding Different Racial Types
So where do racism-by-denial racists get off excluding a child's white heritage?
Such a child can't be called "black" or "Latino" or "white" or "Asian" or "Indian" because he/she is none of those. Such a mongrel child represents the beginning of a different racial type, the beginning of a unique breed capable of passing along unique heritable qualities in physicality, intelligence, temperament and character.
Racism-by-denial has protected the Big Lie about prominent "blacks" from the time of the talented anti-slave lecturer Frederick W. Douglass to present day "first black U.S. governor" Douglas Wilder (both biracial and silent about their white heritage, to showcase their "African" talents).
Racists' Naming Game
Now why would a mixed-race person not demand that he/she be called, say, "human"?
In America today, having any minority status affords one great emotional and monetary capital--from liberals' deep sympathy for historical wrongs to resulting welfare benefits and affirmative-action quotas (used to displace whites in their own civilization) to the I'd-be-successful-if-not-for-racism excuses, which keep whites chained to nation-and culture-destroying social policies (especially immigration from the Third World, which purpose is for diluting and supplanting white civil society by giving minority men access to white women, whom they lust after).
Talented golfer Tiger Woods is keenly aware of the racism-by-denial naming game by not excluding his black or Asian heritage when asked about his ancestry, preferring just to be himself—which position infuriates all of those racist-by-denial "black" Africans.
Racial Mongrelization Kills Good Civilization
All civilizations are built upon racial homogeneity, shared religion and common language. After rumors spread in the known world about any rise of high-culture civilization, other tribes try scrambling to get there.
That leads to racial mongrelization and a resulting loss of those race-specific talents that produced the high culture civilization in the first place.
So white Western democracies are in a terminal condition, as the cycle of the rise and fall of civilizations through d y s g e n i c breeding proceeds apace within them.
Those Racism-by-Denial Racists
G e n e P i r a c y
- Is she black, white or other? -
On page C5 of the April 10th issue of The Washington Times is found an article about Henriette Delille, "First U.S. black woman considered for sainthood," along with her picture. But the photo of the would-be saint isn't of a black woman but a white-appearing one.
Another example is the photo and story of Charles R. Drew, so-called "black inventor" of blood plasma and blood-banking innovations--Washington Times, March 3, 1996, page B5. Mr. Drew appears white not black, having Caucasian features.
Then there is the August 22nd, 1999, review of "Homelands And Waterways: The American Journey Of The Bond Family," which book is about a black Englishman who became an American--a "black" man who just happened to have a white mother.
Or one might read the August 29th review of "Love Across Color Lines: Ottilie Assing and Frederick Douglass," which fails to mention that the always-hunting-white-women Douglas was biracial, and which fact makes examination of "crossing the color line" an exercise in deception.
Or consider the 4x5 picture of a white-appearing man, Michael Gray, who is referred to as a "Blackfoot and Chippewaree Indian," in a September 1st article, "Census Bureau makes effort to count American Indians."
Or one might count the number of light-skinned and Caucasian-featured "blacks" passing as Negroid in many TV ads. Why aren't true blacks protesting the ruse and demanding more Negroid faces in ads?—maybe because any re-definition of "black" shifts the definition of "Negroid" (read my essay, "The 'One-Drop Rule' as Two-Edged Sword").
Excluding The Non-Negroid Parent Is Racist
The Negroid race is gradually shifting the historical/anthropological meaning of "Negroid" through gene piracy--calling people born from mixed-race parentage "black" when they have no logical or legitimate claim to that identity (examine the many photos of "black" inventors, military officers, scientists, authors, physicians, etc., to discover the degree of gene piracy perpetrated by racism-by-denial racists).
By purposely excluding the race of the non-Negroid parent -- partly by embracing the "one-drop rule" used in the past by whites to identify those having any African heritage -- blacks rob whites of their contributing heritage and, ergo, commit gene piracy through racism-by-denial.
[Note: Some argue that all humanity has its origins through a black African ancestor, which argument is falsely used to claim that we're all Africans, and which illogical argument could be used to call ourselves "primordial slime." Whites are not Africans nor primordial slime but a distinct race]
Do Blacks Come In All Colors?
Racism-by-denial is widespread in America, where, as Oprah Winfrey proclaimed on one of her emotion- drenched shows, "Blacks come in all colors!" Examples of the absurd degree to which racism-by-denial can be practiced are found within the Native American cultures, where white-appearing "Indians" travel about the country giving lectures on Indian culture and tout their Indian pride and heritage, exhibiting no discernible Indian heritage except their braided -- sometimes black-dyed -- hair and their Indian jewelry.
Do Whites Come In All Colors, Too?
Why don't whites come in all colors? Because whites aren't scrambling to practice gene piracy, lacking any need to uplift the historical/ anthropological record of their race through racism-by-denial.
Coveting Heritable Talents
Racism-by-denial in America is for uplifting the meaning of "black African"--by attributing to that race the talents and abilities heretofore not generally exhibited by them, so that any unusual talents (particularly intellectual ones) displayed by anyone having any black (or any other minority) heritage are called anything but "white" (a majority of mixed-race couples is of black men and white women. Why? Black males' racism against black women? Why wouldn't black men prefer white women?).
Doesn't the white parent of a mixed-race child have as much claim to demonstrable talents in the child as the black or Latino or Asian or Indian parent? Or does the one-drop rule still protect the white race from dysgenic mongrelization--from loss of the white race?
Breeding Different Racial Types
So where do racism-by-denial racists get off excluding a child's white heritage?
Such a child can't be called "black" or "Latino" or "white" or "Asian" or "Indian" because he/she is none of those. Such a mongrel child represents the beginning of a different racial type, the beginning of a unique breed capable of passing along unique heritable qualities in physicality, intelligence, temperament and character.
Racism-by-denial has protected the Big Lie about prominent "blacks" from the time of the talented anti-slave lecturer Frederick W. Douglass to present day "first black U.S. governor" Douglas Wilder (both biracial and silent about their white heritage, to showcase their "African" talents).
Racists' Naming Game
Now why would a mixed-race person not demand that he/she be called, say, "human"?
In America today, having any minority status affords one great emotional and monetary capital--from liberals' deep sympathy for historical wrongs to resulting welfare benefits and affirmative-action quotas (used to displace whites in their own civilization) to the I'd-be-successful-if-not-for-racism excuses, which keep whites chained to nation-and culture-destroying social policies (especially immigration from the Third World, which purpose is for diluting and supplanting white civil society by giving minority men access to white women, whom they lust after).
Talented golfer Tiger Woods is keenly aware of the racism-by-denial naming game by not excluding his black or Asian heritage when asked about his ancestry, preferring just to be himself—which position infuriates all of those racist-by-denial "black" Africans.
Racial Mongrelization Kills Good Civilization
All civilizations are built upon racial homogeneity, shared religion and common language. After rumors spread in the known world about any rise of high-culture civilization, other tribes try scrambling to get there.
That leads to racial mongrelization and a resulting loss of those race-specific talents that produced the high culture civilization in the first place.
So white Western democracies are in a terminal condition, as the cycle of the rise and fall of civilizations through d y s g e n i c breeding proceeds apace within them.